Hi, Johannes Rohr wrote: > On Sam, Feb 08, 2003 at 05:41:34 +0100, Mika Fischer wrote: > > * Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-08 17:25]: > > > Why is the package not called "kdelibs4c102" ? > > > > Because there never was a klelibs4 package using the g++ 2.95 ABI. > > > > The whole point of waiting until the transition starts before > > uploading KDE was that this way we only need one version in sid an no > > stupid c102 packages :) > > Who chose this weird suffix anyway? Does it have a meaning? Will it go
Yes. The package is compiled with the 102 version of the C++ ABI. > away again some time after the transition? It can go away if the SONAME changes... Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
pgpHusQUFUcqU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
