On Sam, Feb 08, 2003 at 05:41:34 +0100, Mika Fischer wrote: > * Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-08 17:25]: > > Why is the package not called "kdelibs4c102" ? > > Because there never was a klelibs4 package using the g++ 2.95 ABI. > > The whole point of waiting until the transition starts before > uploading KDE was that this way we only need one version in sid an no > stupid c102 packages :)
Who chose this weird suffix anyway? Does it have a meaning? Will it go away again some time after the transition? Thanks, Johannes
