Hi, I have uploaded a draft [1] to salsa. I have kept changelog from jtreg6 (in line with jtreg6 packaging which kept jtreg changelog). Was it a correct thing to do, or should it be truncated? I could not find an ITP bug for jtreg6, does it mean that there is some other process that I need to follow?
Best Regards, Vladimir. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/vpa1977/jtreg7 [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/jtreg6 [3] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jtreg On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 3:53 PM Thorsten Glaser <t.gla...@tarent.de> wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: > > >It is definitely an option to chase those errors and failures down and > >ensure that basic tests pass with jtreg 7.1.1, but keeping around > >jtreg6 for JDK 17 and jtreg7 for JDK 20 is probably an easier option > >that will not require a lot of maintenance overhead. > > Thanks for investigating. Yes, you’ve got convincing arguments, as it’s > not a drop-in compatible replacement ☺ > > bye, > //mirabilos > -- > Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH > Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ > Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 > HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 > Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg > > **************************************************** > /⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon > ╲ ╱ Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen: > ╳ HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newsletter > ╱ ╲ header encryption! > ****************************************************
