On Thu, 2 Mar 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: >OpenJDK 20. We still need jtreg6 and jtreg packages for older >versions of OpenJDK.
openjdk-8 was switched to jtreg6 recently. See if doko will follow for 11. >I was wondering if it would be acceptable for me >to file an intent to package proposal for JTREG7 and package it? Sure, why not (unless someone else is already working on it). Is a new package needed anyway? Can’t this just be an upgrade to jtreg6 (sure that will then look weird as jtreg6 version 7.1-1 but we have lots of such situations)? Is it incompatible somehow? bye, //mirabilos -- Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg **************************************************** /⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon ╲ ╱ Campaign against Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen: ╳ HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newsletter ╱ ╲ header encryption! ****************************************************
