Hello Thomas, Thank you for the welcome message and your wishes for this project. I hope this contribution can be of great benefit to the Debian and non-Debian community. I also want to salute the java packaging team and hope we get to work together.
As Paul mentioned earlier, we've talked about this and there will be no forking. I apologize for not updating the project description (that's done now). My wish is to reuse javahelper as much as possible and build on top of it. I hope we can work together on building and improving these tools. I'm eugecm on #debian-clojure if you need to contact me, I'm there 24/7 and you can also contact me via email. Cheers, Eugenio On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Wolodja Wentland <deb...@babilen5.org>wrote: > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 13:03 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:24:25PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: > > > > So your plan to fork javahelper and to create just another packaging > tool > > > terrified me. Are you really sure that you need to fork javahelper and > that you > > > can not extend javahelper for your needs? > > > > Terrified is a bit strong. > > > > There won't be code copies if we can prevent it (it'd have to be really > > unexpected at this point) and extend / wrap the existing tool where we > can't. > > I agree wholeheartedly with this. It might make sense to clarify this in > the > GSoC project description lest other people also be misled. > -- > Wolodja <deb...@babilen5.org> > > 4096R/CAF14EFC > 081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-clojure-maintainers mailing list > pkg-clojure-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clojure-maintainers > >
