debian-java

Messages by Date

2019/05/14 Bug#928988: RM: openjdk-7/experimental -- ROM; obsolete, no longer builds Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
2019/05/12 Introduction Mechtilde Stehmann
2019/05/07 Re: Fw: A java library proposal for debian Emmanuel Bourg
2019/05/03 Re: Guido Medina
2019/05/03 Re: Hans-Christoph Steiner
2019/05/01 [no subject] Guido Medina
2019/04/30 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Andreas Schildbach
2019/04/30 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Hans-Christoph Steiner
2019/04/29 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Markus Koschany
2019/04/29 RE: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Thomas L
2019/04/28 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Emmanuel Bourg
2019/04/28 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Matthias Klose
2019/04/25 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Timo Aaltonen
2019/04/25 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Timo Aaltonen
2019/04/25 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Emmanuel Bourg
2019/04/24 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Andreas Schildbach
2019/04/24 Re: ~ Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Jonathan Dowland
2019/04/24 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Emmanuel Bourg
2019/04/24 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Jonathan Dowland
2019/04/23 Re: Is anybody able to reproduce this issue (help urgently needed) (Was: Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid)) Gilles Filippini
2019/04/23 Re: Bug#923749: Is anybody able to reproduce this issue (help urgently needed) (Was: Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid)) Santiago Vila
2019/04/23 Re: Bug#923749: Is anybody able to reproduce this issue (help urgently needed) (Was: Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid)) Santiago Vila
2019/04/23 Is anybody able to reproduce this issue (help urgently needed) (Was: Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid)) Andreas Tille
2019/04/17 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng David Goodenough
2019/04/17 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng Mykola Nikishov
2019/04/17 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng Andrius Merkys
2019/04/17 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng shirish शिरीष
2019/04/17 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng Sagar Patke
2019/04/17 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng shirish शिरीष
2019/04/17 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng Andrius Merkys
2019/04/16 European Commission Tomcat Hackathon on 4 and 5 May 2019 Gĳs Hillenius
2019/04/16 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng shirish शिरीष
2019/04/16 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng Andrius Merkys
2019/04/16 Re: [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng shirish शिरीष
2019/04/16 [OT] Cannot use the Java offline utility given at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/downloads/offlineUtilities?lang=eng shirish शिरीष
2019/04/16 Re: Why OpenJDK debugging symbols for 12 and 13 are not allowed? Matthias Klose
2019/04/12 Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid) Andreas Tille
2019/04/11 Re: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912) Matthias Klose
2019/04/11 Re: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912) Paul Gevers
2019/04/11 Why OpenJDK debugging symbols for 12 and 13 are not allowed? Mykola Nikishov
2019/04/10 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Thorsten Glaser
2019/04/10 RE: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Thomas L
2019/04/10 Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Emmanuel Bourg
2019/04/09 openjdk-8 removed from Buster? Thomas L
2019/04/09 Re: Looking on how to contribute to the Debian Java Packaging Team Andreas Tille
2019/04/08 Re: Looking on how to contribute to the Debian Java Packaging Team Eugene Zhukov
2019/04/07 Re: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912) Samuel Thibault
2019/04/07 Re: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912) Vincent Privat
2019/04/07 Re: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912) Samuel Thibault
2019/04/07 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Thorsten Glaser
2019/04/07 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Ivo De Decker
2019/04/07 Re: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912) Vincent Privat
2019/04/07 Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912) Samuel Thibault
2019/04/06 Re: Bug#924634: libuima-as-java depends on the removed libspring-jms-java Matthias Klose
2019/04/06 Re: Bug#900912: "AtkWrapper not found" error impacting JOSM on Ubuntu/Mint Matthias Klose
2019/04/06 Re: Bug#900912: "AtkWrapper not found" error impacting JOSM on Ubuntu/Mint Paul Gevers
2019/04/06 Re: Looking on how to contribute to the Debian Java Packaging Team Hans-Christoph Steiner
2019/04/06 Looking on how to contribute to the Debian Java Packaging Team ARMANDO FERREIRA LEE ENG
2019/04/05 Re: Bug#900912: "AtkWrapper not found" error impacting JOSM on Ubuntu/Mint Samuel Thibault
2019/04/05 Re: Bug#900912: "AtkWrapper not found" error impacting JOSM on Ubuntu/Mint Matthias Klose
2019/04/04 Re: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid Andreas Tille
2019/04/03 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Thorsten Glaser
2019/04/03 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Emmanuel Bourg
2019/04/03 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Thorsten Glaser
2019/04/03 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Emmanuel Bourg
2019/04/02 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Thorsten Glaser
2019/04/02 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Emmanuel Bourg
2019/04/02 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Thorsten Glaser
2019/04/02 Re: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid Andreas Tille
2019/04/01 Re: Bug#900912: "AtkWrapper not found" error impacting JOSM on Ubuntu/Mint Samuel Thibault
2019/04/01 Re: Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project Andrius Merkys
2019/04/01 Re: Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project Emmanuel Bourg
2019/04/01 Re: Bug#900912: "AtkWrapper not found" error impacting JOSM on Ubuntu/Mint Samuel Thibault
2019/04/01 Re: Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project Andrius Merkys
2019/04/01 Re: Bug#925473: tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”) Thorsten Glaser
2019/04/01 Re: Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project Markus Koschany
2019/04/01 Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project Andrius Merkys
2019/03/31 Re: Partial triaging Giovanni Mascellani
2019/03/30 Partial triaging Giovanni Mascellani
2019/03/29 Re: Missing javah? Emmanuel Bourg
2019/03/29 Missing javah? Giovanni Mascellani
2019/03/29 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/29 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Moritz Mühlenhoff
2019/03/29 Re: Bug#925928: tomcat9: Error occurred during initialization of VM: Option -XX:+UseG1GC not supported Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/28 patches available Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/27 Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings Helmut Grohne
2019/03/27 Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/27 Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings Johannes Schauer
2019/03/27 Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings Helmut Grohne
2019/03/27 Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/27 Re: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid Andreas Tille
2019/03/26 Re: One step ahead but compile errors (Was: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar) Andreas Tille
2019/03/26 Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings Johannes Schauer
2019/03/26 Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings Helmut Grohne
2019/03/26 cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings Matthias Klose
2019/03/26 Re: libspring-java: stopped building libspring-jms-java and libspring-messaging-java Emmanuel Bourg
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Emmanuel Bourg
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Emmanuel Bourg
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Scott Kitterman
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/25 Re: One step ahead but compile errors (Was: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar) Markus Koschany
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Moritz Muehlenhoff
2019/03/25 Re: One step ahead but compile errors (Was: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar) Markus Koschany
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Emmanuel Bourg
2019/03/25 Re: Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/25 Bug#925454: RM: tomcat8 -- ROM; Replaced by tomcat9 Emmanuel Bourg
2019/03/25 Re: One step ahead but compile errors (Was: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar) Andreas Tille
2019/03/21 One step ahead but compile errors (Was: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar) Andreas Tille
2019/03/15 Re: Bug#924635: libactivemq-java depends on the removed libspring-jms-java Emmanuel Bourg
2019/03/14 Re: Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Matthias Klose
2019/03/14 Re: Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Emmanuel Bourg
2019/03/14 Re: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Andreas Tille
2019/03/13 Re: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Emmanuel Bourg
2019/03/13 Re: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Markus Koschany
2019/03/13 Re: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Matthias Klose
2019/03/13 Re: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Andreas Tille
2019/03/12 Re: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Andreas Tille
2019/03/12 netlib-java contains nealy empty jar (Was: mtj: FTBFS in buster/sid) Andreas Tille
2019/03/11 Help us understand the effects of developers' personality on collaboration in OSS development collab . uniba
2019/03/08 Important : We were unable to renew your membership NetfIix
2019/03/05 Re: Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid Markus Koschany
2019/03/05 Re: Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid Andreas Tille
2019/03/05 Re: Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid Markus Koschany
2019/03/05 Re: Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid Andreas Tille
2019/03/05 Re: Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid Andreas Tille
2019/03/04 Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid Olivier Sallou
2019/03/04 Re: Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid Andreas Tille
2019/02/26 Re: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9 Markus Koschany
2019/02/26 Re: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9 Miguel Landaeta
2019/02/26 Re: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9 Andrej Shadura
2019/02/26 Re: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9 Emmanuel Bourg
2019/02/26 Re: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9 Markus Koschany
2019/02/25 Re: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9 Miguel Landaeta
2019/02/25 Bug#923245: unblock: procyon/0.5.32-5 Emmanuel Bourg
2019/02/21 Powermock RC #875358 Markus Koschany
2019/02/19 Re: libmilib-java depends libredberry-pipe-java (>= 1.0.0-alpha0) but should rather libredberry-pipe-java (>= 1.0.0~alpha0) Emmanuel Bourg
2019/02/19 libmilib-java depends libredberry-pipe-java (>= 1.0.0-alpha0) but should rather libredberry-pipe-java (>= 1.0.0~alpha0) Andreas Tille
2019/02/18 Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name Markus Koschany
2019/02/17 Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name tony mancill
2019/02/17 Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name Markus Koschany
2019/02/17 Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name tony mancill
2019/02/17 RE: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name Ingo Bauersachs
2019/02/16 Re: rules / restrictions for packages to contrib Thorsten Glaser
2019/02/16 Re: rules / restrictions for packages to contrib seamlik
2019/02/16 rules / restrictions for packages to contrib Thomas Finneid
2019/02/16 Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/15 Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name Markus Koschany
2019/02/15 Re: old version of scala Markus Koschany
2019/02/15 Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name tony mancill
2019/02/14 Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/14 Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Emmanuel Bourg
2019/02/14 Re: old version of scala Markus Koschany
2019/02/14 Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8 Markus Koschany
2019/02/14 Re: Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/14 Re: Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8 Thomas Finneid
2019/02/14 Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Gary Gregory
2019/02/14 Re: old version of scala Markus Koschany
2019/02/14 Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8 Markus Koschany
2019/02/13 Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8 Thomas Finneid
2019/02/13 Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/13 Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name Markus Koschany
2019/02/13 AW: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Bernd Eckenfels
2019/02/13 Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Michael Osipov
2019/02/13 Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Dalibor Topic
2019/02/13 Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Markus Koschany
2019/02/12 Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8 Markus Koschany
2019/02/12 Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8 Thomas Finneid
2019/02/12 Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8 Markus Koschany
2019/02/12 sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8 Thomas Finneid
2019/02/12 Re: old version of scala Markus Koschany
2019/02/12 Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Robert Scholte
2019/02/12 Re: Please remove repository the now outdated java-team/milib (package was moved to med-team) Emmanuel Bourg
2019/02/12 Re: Please remove repository the now outdated java-team/milib (package was moved to med-team) Steffen Möller
2019/02/12 Please remove repository the now outdated java-team/milib (package was moved to med-team) Andreas Tille
2019/02/12 Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Markus Koschany
2019/02/11 Re: old version of scala Thorsten Glaser
2019/02/08 Re: old version of scala Markus Koschany
2019/02/07 Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/07 Re: old version of scala Thorsten Glaser
2019/02/07 Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/07 Re: Re: old version of scala Thorsten Glaser
2019/02/06 Re: Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/06 Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/06 Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Markus Koschany
2019/02/05 Log4j2 in stretch Robert Middleton
2019/02/05 Re: old version of scala Thorsten Glaser
2019/02/05 Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/05 Re: old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/05 Re: old version of scala Thorsten Glaser
2019/02/04 old version of scala Thomas Finneid
2019/02/03 Re: Buster soft freeze question tony mancill
2019/02/03 Re: Buster soft freeze question Felix Natter
2019/02/03 Bug#921217: RM: openjdk-8-jre-dcevm -- ROM; Replaced by openjdk-11-jre-dcevm Emmanuel Bourg
2019/02/01 Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Markus Koschany
2019/02/01 Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Emmanuel Bourg
2019/02/01 Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Emmanuel Bourg
2019/02/01 Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Markus Koschany