On Apr 4, 2012 18:05 "tony mancill" <tmanc...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Niels, >
Hi, > Sorry of that tripped you up. Not the least. :) > I have been thinking that responses to > RFS emails aren't terribly useful if the sponsored upload occurs > directly - meaning at the same time that the [SPONSORED] email would > be > sent - given that most (all?) of the folks who can sponsor uploads are > also members of Java team and will be copied on the email that goes > out > to pkg-java-maintainers. If it's going to take some time to sponsor > an > upload, then I think an "ITS" response is appropriate. > > However, maybe skipping the [SPONSORED] email is not conducive for > people who read the Java list via the archives? > That is actually one of the reasons I prefer adding follow ups. A new person might read the lists first and if he/she sees a lot of "unanswered" RFS, then we just look like we can never bother to reply people. The second reason is that it makes it easier for me to see/remember which of the RFSs have received attention (d-java and pkg-java ends in different mail folders on my end). > Any thoughts? > Thank you, > tony > > [...] ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120405131608.ea82f5f9ad...@bmail03.one.com
