Hi Niels, Sorry of that tripped you up. I have been thinking that responses to RFS emails aren't terribly useful if the sponsored upload occurs directly - meaning at the same time that the [SPONSORED] email would be sent - given that most (all?) of the folks who can sponsor uploads are also members of Java team and will be copied on the email that goes out to pkg-java-maintainers. If it's going to take some time to sponsor an upload, then I think an "ITS" response is appropriate.
However, maybe skipping the [SPONSORED] email is not conducive for people who read the Java list via the archives? Any thoughts? Thank you, tony On 04/03/2012 02:31 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-03-29 23:47, Jakub Adam wrote: >> Dear java packagers, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for package "httpcomponents-client". >> >> * Package name : httpcomponents-client >> Version : 4.1.1-2 >> Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation >> * URL : http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client/index.html >> * License : Apache-2.0 >> Section : java >> >> It builds those binary packages: >> >> libhttpclient-java - HTTP/1.1 compliant HTTP agent implementation >> libhttpmime-java - HTTP/1.1 compliant HTTP agent implementation - >> mime4j extension >> >> I let maven-bundle-plugin generate OSGi metadata for JAR library (new >> dependency >> of eclipse-mylyn 3.7.0), updated Standards-Version and fixed some >> lintian warnings. >> >> Package source can be accessed at pkg-java git repository: >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/httpcomponents-client.git >> >> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Jakub Adam >> >> > > Hi, > > Seems to been uploaded by Tony Mancill[1], so I guess this is done. :) > > ~Niels > > [1] > $ who-uploads httpcomponents-client -M1 > Uploads for httpcomponents-client: > 4.1.1-2 to unstable: tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
