Hello Gabriele, Your package looks good, I have fixed some details on copyright and binary files remaining in the upstream package, so if a DD is available please release this package to experimental.
Now that we have JME version 2 done, let's see what's needed for version 3. Ludovic On 11/30/2010 02:42 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > > On 11/30/2010 12:24 AM, Ludovic Claude wrote: >> Hello Erlend, > >> All right, I will try to help you to package jMonkeyEngine, that looks >> like a fun project to work with. It will take some time though, I have a >> long list of TODO already, and to package this project, we need first to >> package all its dependencies. Those projects looks already not so >> trivial, and many use JNI bindings and native code, which I'm not very >> comfortable with. > >> jogl 1.1.1 is already packaged for Debian, which is good, >> lwjgl 2.5 is packaged in Debian, can you upgrade jMonkeyEngine to this >> version? >> jinput 20100502 is in Debian, again, can you use this version? >> gluegen is not packaged, we will need to package it first. >> jorbis 0.0.17 is in Debian, can you use this version? >> swt is available in Debian , which version are you using? >> Also, can you make available the sources of jme-colladatabinding, if >> possible with a versioned branch? This project will probably need its >> own package, unless its release cycle matches jme, in which cse it's >> less costly to package it inside jMonkeyEngine. > >> Most of the dependencies are already in Debian, so the troublemakers are >> less daunting already ;-) > >> I'm CC-ing the Debian Java team, maybe some other people will be >> interested as well to help. > >> When do you plan to release version 3.0? It would be nice to provide the >> Debian packaging shortly after that release, and it would avoid some >> unnecessary updates in Debian. > > > Hi Ludovic, > FWIW I packaged version 2.0 some months ago [1]. It's still there [2] > and waiting for a sponsorship. > If nobody wants to upload it as is, it might be a starting point to > package 3.0. > > I started to package jme because a software I was packaging (in the > meanwhile I gave up) depends on it. > It's born as "public" so every team member may feel free to add > himself to Uploaders and keep it up. > If you don't like that, feel free to take my ITP over. > > As [1] says, reviews/uploads would be appreciated. > > Niels, 1st reviewer, I've just seen you're DD now, congrats! If > interested, now you can :) > > > Cheers, > Gabriele > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2010/07/msg00007.html > [2] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jme/jme_2.0.1+dfsg-1.dsc > > >> On 11/28/2010 11:33 AM, Erlend Sogge Heggen wrote: >>> *Hello ludovicc,* >>> >>> Thanks for getting in touch >>> <http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10169360#post10169360>! I hope >>> you don't mind, but I intend to let you take the lead on this one >>> straight off the bat. I've tried contacting some other people found on >>> similar Java packaging pages as the ones you pointed out, but I can't >>> seem to get it right. With the links you provided me I've got some new >>> options to pursue, but if you could just tell me to what extent you will >>> be able to help us, we can take it from there. >>> >>> To answer your question in the thread, we use Ant. If make sure to >>> reply-to-all then Normen and Kirill here will be able to answer any >>> technical questions you might have. Our main goal here is to come up >>> with a solution that won't be a drain on anyone's time, I hope that's >>> reasonable. >>> >>> /Best regards,/ >>> / >>> / >>> /~ Erlend Sogge Heggen/ > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cf6cc48....@laposte.net
