Thank you very much for all your support. It seems I've been a little unclear, as jME 3.0 is what we are interested in packaging, not 2.0. To be precise, we are talking about the SDK release of jMonkeyEngine 3.0 Alpha3: http://jmonkeyengine.org/downloads/?did=2
<http://jmonkeyengine.org/downloads/?did=2>To check for dependencies, see the following sources: http://code.google.com/p/jmonkeyengine/source/browse/#svn/branches/jme3 <http://code.google.com/p/jmonkeyengine/source/browse/#svn/branches/jme3> http://code.google.com/p/jmonkeyengine/source/browse/#svn/branches/jme3-gde <http://code.google.com/p/jmonkeyengine/source/browse/#svn/branches/jme3-gde>Whatever else information you need just ask and I'm sure Kirill or Normen can provide it. ~ Erlend On 30 November 2010 02:42, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/30/2010 12:24 AM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > > Hello Erlend, > > > > All right, I will try to help you to package jMonkeyEngine, that looks > > like a fun project to work with. It will take some time though, I have a > > long list of TODO already, and to package this project, we need first to > > package all its dependencies. Those projects looks already not so > > trivial, and many use JNI bindings and native code, which I'm not very > > comfortable with. > > > > jogl 1.1.1 is already packaged for Debian, which is good, > > lwjgl 2.5 is packaged in Debian, can you upgrade jMonkeyEngine to this > > version? > > jinput 20100502 is in Debian, again, can you use this version? > > gluegen is not packaged, we will need to package it first. > > jorbis 0.0.17 is in Debian, can you use this version? > > swt is available in Debian , which version are you using? > > Also, can you make available the sources of jme-colladatabinding, if > > possible with a versioned branch? This project will probably need its > > own package, unless its release cycle matches jme, in which cse it's > > less costly to package it inside jMonkeyEngine. > > > > Most of the dependencies are already in Debian, so the troublemakers are > > less daunting already ;-) > > > > I'm CC-ing the Debian Java team, maybe some other people will be > > interested as well to help. > > > > When do you plan to release version 3.0? It would be nice to provide the > > Debian packaging shortly after that release, and it would avoid some > > unnecessary updates in Debian. > > > > Hi Ludovic, > FWIW I packaged version 2.0 some months ago [1]. It's still there [2] > and waiting for a sponsorship. > If nobody wants to upload it as is, it might be a starting point to > package 3.0. > > I started to package jme because a software I was packaging (in the > meanwhile I gave up) depends on it. > It's born as "public" so every team member may feel free to add > himself to Uploaders and keep it up. > If you don't like that, feel free to take my ITP over. > > As [1] says, reviews/uploads would be appreciated. > > Niels, 1st reviewer, I've just seen you're DD now, congrats! If > interested, now you can :) > > > Cheers, > Gabriele > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2010/07/msg00007.html > [2] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jme/jme_2.0.1+dfsg-1.dsc > > > > On 11/28/2010 11:33 AM, Erlend Sogge Heggen wrote: > >> *Hello ludovicc,* > >> > >> Thanks for getting in touch > >> <http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10169360#post10169360>! I > hope > >> you don't mind, but I intend to let you take the lead on this one > >> straight off the bat. I've tried contacting some other people found on > >> similar Java packaging pages as the ones you pointed out, but I can't > >> seem to get it right. With the links you provided me I've got some new > >> options to pursue, but if you could just tell me to what extent you will > >> be able to help us, we can take it from there. > >> > >> To answer your question in the thread, we use Ant. If make sure to > >> reply-to-all then Normen and Kirill here will be able to answer any > >> technical questions you might have. Our main goal here is to come up > >> with a solution that won't be a drain on anyone's time, I hope that's > >> reasonable. > >> > >> /Best regards,/ > >> / > >> / > >> /~ Erlend Sogge Heggen/ > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkz0Vm0ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsK2ACfXvBF1hzqO5n5MAEmwI5Al4vn > cTwAoJpHIKF0Lvn4PYxA+m66XAy3zmMA > =Dnvy > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
