You should *not* run install.jsp, the package is supposed to take care of everything that install.jsp does.
On 28.11.2010, at 0.40, David Goodenough wrote: > There do still seem to be problems with permissions and ownership. > > Having added libjabsorb-java and found copies of jstl.jar and standard.jar > and given write access to things like /usr/share/jspwiki/WEB-INF I got > a bit further. > > If one tries running Install.jsp (and I do not know whether this is still > supposed to be needed) it says it has already been run. This means that > I can not set up the password on the admin user. Am I supposed to run > it? > > I have not uses the pkg-java SVN repo before, can I check a deb file > out from it, or do I have to build from it and if so what is the build > procedure? > > David > > On Saturday 27 November 2010, tony mancill wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> Thank you for testing. It sounds like we have a ways to go before we can >> reasonably ask the release team to include jspwiki in squeeze. I've run >> the svn-inject to bring the package into the pkg-java SVN repo [1] for >> team maintenance and will fix the missing dependency on libjabsorb. We >> can work from repo to sort out the other issues. >> >> Thanks, >> Tony >> >> [1] svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/jspwiki >> >> On 11/27/2010 03:13 AM, David Goodenough wrote: >>> I just installed it, and it does not install cleanly, but I have not yet >>> got it to work. >>> >>> I notice that in the README.Debian it says that the directory structure >>> is:- >>> >>> /var/lib/jspwiki contains WikiPages and attachments. >>> >>> /usr/share/java/webapps/JSPWiki contains the JSP pages, Java libraries, >>> and page templates. >>> >>> /etc/jspwiki contains all configuration files. >>> >>> /etc/tomcat6/policy.d/05jspwiki.policy is a symbolic link to >>> /etc/jspwiki/tomcat.policy >>> >>> But there is no directory /usr/share/java/webapps, and these files >>> seem to be in /usr/share/jspwiki. This however is just a docs error >>> I think, the ContextPath in jspwiki.xml is correct. >>> >>> However when I try to use JSPWiki, I keep getting a message in the >>> tomcat catalina.out log file:- >>> >>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: ContainerBase.addChild: start: >>> LifecycleException: start: : java.io.IOException: Failed to access >>> resource /WEB-INF/lib/jabsorb.jar >>> >>> Looking in the /usr/share/java directory, jabsorb.jar is indeed missing, >>> so I guess we have a missing dependency on libjabsorb-java. I also >>> notice that there are links to files from the tomcat6-webapps package, >>> which is not listed as a dependency and so I did not have loaded. >>> Loading libjabsorb-java fixed the first problem, but there is no >>> tomcat6-webapps package, yet the links refer to >>> /usr/share/tomcat6-webapps/. Looking at the packages.debian.org > site, >>> the jar files references (jstl.jar and standard.jar) only exist in part >>> of netbeans. >>> >>> David >>> >>> On Friday 26 November 2010, tony mancill wrote: >>>> Hi Adnan, >>>> >>>> Uploaded to unstable with one additional minor change. In >>> >>> jspwiki.postinst >>> >>>> gets the tomcat6 user from debconf instead of using the hardcoded >>> >>> username >>> >>>> "tomcat6" for the chown. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> tony >>>> >>>> On 11/26/2010 09:17 AM, tony mancill wrote: >>>>> I've pulled the package and the changes look good to me (which > could >>> >>> be >>> >>>>> because they're almost identical to the changes I worked up locally, >>>>> but didn't have time to test thoroughly). I think we can reference >>>>> both the libservlet-2.3 bugs, 576903 and 581024 and I think we > should >>>>> list the team address as the maintainer (I'll put your address in the >>>>> uploader field if you'd like), but but otherwise I'll upload your >>>>> package as it is on mentors to unstable. >>>>> >>>>> I know the time is quite short with respect to the the release, but >>>>> since the upload addresses a grave bug, it may still be considered. >>>>> (On the other hand, given the number of changes, I wouldn't be >>>>> surprised if >>> >>> they >>> >>>>> opted to pass on this - in any event, the new version is needed in > the >>>>> archive.) The best way to communicate with them is to use > reportbug >>> >>> to >>> >>>>> file a bug against >>>>> release.debian.org, then indicate the version of jspwiki and note > that >>>>> the upload of 2.8.0-4 addresses the RC bug. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> tony >>>>> >>>>> On 11/25/2010 12:00 PM, Adnan Hodzic wrote: >>>>>>> That's great. Have you uploaded the package and notified the >>> >>> release >>> >>>>>>> team? I don't see the new version on the PTS page [0] yet. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, I uploaded package to mentors: >>>>>> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor- >>> >>> pkglist?action=details;package >>> >>>>>> =jspwiki >>>>>> >>>>>> I haven't notified the release team, if you could provide me > guidance >>>>>> with what I should tell them, I'll gladly notify them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Adnan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:34 PM, tony mancill > <tmanc...@debian.org> >>> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Adnan, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's great. Have you uploaded the package and notified the >>> >>> release >>> >>>>>>> team? I don't see the new version on the PTS page [0] yet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> tony >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jspwiki.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/25/2010 08:02 AM, Adnan Hodzic wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just waned to let you know I fixed all the build-deps and as well >>>>>>>> all the other stuff depending on tomcat5.5 including postinst. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Building and installing works just fine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Seems like jspwiki will make it into squeeze after all? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Adnan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, tony mancill >>> >>> <tmanc...@debian.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 10/29/2010 07:39 AM, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 29.10.2010, at 17.14, tony mancill wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Any opinions on adding a tomcat dependency? I realise > that >>> >>> it's >>> >>>>>>>>>>> conceivable to run JspWiki without it, but suspect that the >>> >>> vast >>> >>>>>>>>>>> majority of users would prefer for the wiki to work >>>>>>>>>>> "out-of-the-box" (i.e. with minimal setup). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The dependency was removed due to a user request, so my >>> >>> opinion is >>> >>>>>>>>>> that it should depend on Tomcat. Yes, you can run JSPWiki > with >>>>>>>>>> Jetty, but it is a bit hassle, as I understand it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hmmm... for squeeze I think the choices are either to remove >>> >>> jspwiki >>> >>>>>>>>> entirely or to depend directly on tomcat6. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any strong opinions or suggestions one way or another? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>> tony -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/88e323d2-85e0-4beb-ae72-aa98c8de5...@iki.fi
