On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Vincent Fourmond <fourm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Torsten Werner <twer...@debian.org> wrote: >> Am 19.07.2010 13:15, schrieb Vincent Fourmond: >>> There is a small glitch that I hadn't noticed when you asked for >>> feedback about the new fop 1.0 release. If I understand right, fop 1.0 >>> isn't out yet, and you've packaged a SVN snapshot ? >> >> it is tagged as 1.0: >> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/tags/fop-1_0/>. > > Ah, great ! > > This simplifies the problem, but we still need to indicate where the > tarball is coming from. > > And I still wish I had the packaging bits, though ;-)... >
The tarball was taken from Simon Pepping html_public: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588895#15 I will be playing lotto tonight, because the snapshot is actually *exactly* the fop 1.0 version: $ wget http://www.apache.org/dist/xmlgraphics/fop/source/fop-1.0-src.tar.gz $ md5sum fop-1.0-src.tar.gz 95dcc4c2dd08b4bc88ce9ce1ee88c439 fop-1.0-src.tar.gz I will try to remember your advice, next time I play with experimental stuff. Thanks for your feedback ! -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=ayyfpj1gakwnzuwz830yscqgk2fsrwyos2...@mail.gmail.com
