On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:42:38PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote: > I think we generally agreed that the best way was "one source package", > "many binary packages" (one per Jar). But I'm wondering if we should > reconsider. > > Because of its "plug-in" architecture wagon has a number of very small > Jars. For example the "wagon-file" and "ssh-external" Jars each have > only one class in them. With separate binary packages we would end up > with a number of packages containing trivial Jars. > > I suggest we use just one binary package (plus another -doc package, of > course). Does that sound OK to everybody?
Ok. It really makes no sense to split this into many packages. I think we can agree that we need to decide this on a case by case basis. ;-) Cheers, Michael -- .''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org> `. `' | `- | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
