Marcus Better writes: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > > It's a good idea to remove generated javadoc and jar files and classes. > > > > Very much so. Unless you build from source, you have no way to know > > that the binaries correspond to that source code. You can't even > > guarantee that you're not violating the GPL, which requires you to > > provide source code on demand. > > That may be a valid argument, but there are more troubling cases. For > instance we ship a lot of packages that build with Maven, but since we > don't have Maven in Debian, we use the included, pre-generated, Ant build > file instead. What should we do about those?
if these packages are in main, file a RC report and remove them, at least from testing. I don't care that much about contrib. Such packages may exist in non-free. Then package maven and maven2. which packages are these? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
