On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:48:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: ... > Unpacking libswt3.1-gtk-java (from libswt3.1-gtk-java_3.1-9_all.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing libswt3.1-gtk-java_3.1-9_all.deb (--install): > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/java/swt-gtk-3.1.jar', which is also in > package libswt-gtk-3.1-java > ... > But who's supposed to be building these packages anyway -- you or > Shaun? And why the very subtle difference in name: libswt3.1-gtk-java > (Michael) versus libswt-gtk-3.1-java (Shaun)?
In replay you said it is possible the same package be build from 2 source, but I guess there should be a virtual package that both packages provide and other package depends on, right? (libswingwt-java depends on libswt-gtk-3.1-java for example) ... right, but still not very useful, eclipse could just depend (and build-depends) on libswt-gtk-3.1-java and build script just rm -rf or something cleaner (do not build at all). In other way if eclipse depends exactly to the same version, libswt-gtk-3.1-java could be removed (in the near future). Why all this problems? because there was a previous threads about do not stress automatic build system and Debian resources .. Anyway thanks for packaging eclipse 3.1, I missed the release and I had build (some days ago) eclipse 3.0.2 with the same script from Jerry, not very clean, but it compiles cleanly and works .. (I think this is just FYI: gcj, and java-gcj-compat and others .. your are walking in the right way) Ciao, Daniele. ps.: gcjappletviewer now does not work any more and give: ** ERROR **: file ../../../src/libjava/jni/gtk-peer/gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_GtkImage.c: line 572 (createRawData): assertion failed: (data_fid != 0) aborting... finally an assert error and line number! ;) -- ___ Daniele Cruciani http://www.smartango.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
