Tue, 3 May 2005 15:08:49 +0200, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:45:52AM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: >> I think some of upstream agrees with me. I don't think calling it bcabi >> was ever officially intended. >> >> I think mjw (who is that, Mark?) recommended against both -jbi and >> -bcabi and for -gcj. I'm on board with that if we can get other >> agreement. > > When you re-read the list you will see that I was for -gcj from start. Not me ;-) but well, if I'm the only one... -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
