On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 08:23:53AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote: *SNIP* > Also, as the upstream kaffe maintainer, I'd really like it if for each > package that was stuck in contrib because kaffe can't run it (eg. > unimplemented APIs, etc), there was a "wishlist" bug filed against kaffe > stating how it fails. I suppose that goes for the other JVMs too. > Maybe that could be worked into the policy?
Sure. If you can create a phrase that states this in a general way (not only kaffe?) I'll happily apply it. File it as a whishlist bug against java-common. Regards, // Ola > Cheers, > > - Jim > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING | | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
