On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 02:45:24PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 05:41:29PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > http://people.debian.org/~opal/java/policy.html/policy.html > > The following, > > Both are shipped as Java bytecode (*.class files, packaged in a > *.jar archive) and with an "Architecture: all" since Java > bytecode is supposed to be portable. > > seems to forbid both code with native parts, and Java code compiled > to machine binaries with gcj. It seems reasonable to me to allow > both of these.
Well I do not really understand this. Java code is supposed to be portable. If you compile it to machine binaries it is no longer a java program and should not be packaged as a such. Non java components should be extracted to a separate package IMHO. Regards, // Ola > Andrew > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING | | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
