Adam Heath wrote:
On 20 Nov 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) should be fixed to provide java-runtime.
Ben> Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the Ben> gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as Ben> command-line incompatibility, etc).
If that's the case, please have them file bug reports in the gcc Gnats system. I'd be interested in addressing the problems, if only I knew what they were.
Why in gnats? gnats has nothing to do with the debian meta information.
I believe Tom meant: If you find a problem where gij is command-line incompatible with javac, then we consider that a bug in gij, not in the debian packaging of gij, and so the bug should be reported to the "upstream" maintainers - which means using gnats.
--Per
