Ben Burton wrote:
Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is)
should be fixed to provide java-runtime.
Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the gcc
maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as command-line
incompatibility, etc).
The "gij" command tries to be more-or-less compatible with the "java"
command.
If by "gcc maintainers" you means the Debian gcc maintainers, I don't know
who they are. But if you mean the people actually developing gcj, well I
don't know if any of them are involved in maintaining Debian packages.
--Per
