On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:23:47PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > Seeing as java policy is getting a work through right now, I personally > have no problems with removing /usr/share/java/repository in favour of > versioned jars. > > Does anyone have reasons why /usr/share/java/repository should remain?
No do do not like that repository. Can we have some consensus about this? Should I remove it from the policy? > Currently the java libraries I package are in the form of: > > /usr/share/java/foo-version.jar > /usr/share/java/foo.jar -> foo-version.jar This is probably the best one. Should I add that to the repository? Just one though. The symlink. Should that be automaticly generated by a tool that are runned from the postinst script or should it be provided by the (latest, or most compatible) version of the package? Regards, // Ola > Ben. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING | | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
