On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 02:04:19PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > Ok this shounds good, but some things before I'll add it to the > > policy. > > > > * Should we have a java2-compiler too? > > This probably should be discussed. It would be nice for Build-depends: > lines in debian/control files. > > > * The java-virtual-machine should only be provided by the java2 virtual > > machine if it is (completely?) backwards compatible. > > Agreed (BTW - I'd be interested to know wich java2 environments > aren't java1 backwards compatible).
Me too. > > * Should we have a java1-virtual-machine? > > Would this be instead of having java-virtual-machine, or in addition > to it ? In adition, but my last posting about java-virtual-machine, java1-runtime and java2-runtime is probably better. Regards, // Ola > Cheers, > > Marcus > -- > ..... > ,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter > ;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer > $: $$$$: Open Software Associates GmbH > $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse > ;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany > ' /( &&& > \_&&&&' Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > &&&&. Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200 > &&&&&&&: > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING | | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
