Artur, No package should depend directly on Sun's (or any other) Java implementation. Rather, they should depend on java-virtual-machine or java-compiler.
Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS/CM>CC/IT d- s:+ a16 C++(++++)>$ UL++++>$ P--- L++>++$ E+ W+(-) N+ o? K? w---() !O !M !V PS+(++)>+ PE-(--) Y+>+ PGP t+>++ !5 X-- R>++ tv(+) b+(++) DI(+) D++ G>+++ e--> h! !r y>+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Artur Radosz wrote: > Seth Arnold wrote: > > > * Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010302 01:10]: > > > >>> Artur, the problem is very simple. I hope I can explain it simply enoug > >>> Debian is about Free Software. Free as in BSD, GPL, LGPL, Artistic, > >>> XFree86, etc. All these licenses satisfy the requirements of the Debian > >> > >> What about non-free? What about real-player? Netscape and others? > > > > > > non-free is not part of Debian. realplayer comes only as an installer. > > For me it`s :). It`s listed in installer. Mirorred on your sites. > Packaged in .deb. > > > Netscape is there by virtue of being *the* web browser. I would imagine > > its days are numbered. (As konqueror, mozilla, and more improve > > drastically every day..) > > Yeah, mozilla is really, really close. Btw. mozilla gui isn`t > customizable? Funny. > > Anyway, there is a way to put java2 in debian (ok, in non-free) as > installer. However i don`t like realplayer installer. Instead i see > a installer that fetch archive (like in xanim modules), before this > displaying licensee and using sun webpages, just with different dislplay > method. I hope that it will don`t break Your laws. Could it go into > non-free? > Another question what about packages that will depends on it? Where it > should go? Contrib sounds resonable. > > slu > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
