On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:11:43PM -0300, Julio wrote: > Can a virtual package have a version (to be set by a 'real' package that > implements it)? If so, it'd be useful to have java-virtual-machine packages > to set their jdk-compliance versions (1.0, 1.1, 1.2) when installing (or > being set by update-alternatives), since it's better to bind some packages on > virtual machines of specific versions.
I agree with this concept as well. also. can we make it "jvm", instead of "java-virtual-machine"? jvm-sun-1.1 jvm-sun-1.2 jvm-iso-? It would probably be prudent to eliminate the word "java" from every Debian package name, description, etc. since it is a trademark first and a language second. E -- ___________________________________________________________________ Ean Schuessler As above Novare International Inc. so below *** WARNING: This signature may contain jokes.
