Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > file. Changelog entries should be focused on the change, not the bug, and > should be descriptive enough to allow someone who was not involved with the > bug report (e.g., most users of the package) to understand what changed.
Is there any reason to include text saying "more info in BTS"? IMO there is a reason to refer to external sources (like Kaffe lists etc.) but isn't it obvious that BTS contains more information if a changelog entry closes a BTS bug? Just a cosmetic nitpick, thanks for the latest Kaffe! -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
