I've been scolded for this same practice in the past. The preference is to copy in the upstream changelog.
On Thursday 08 January 2004 07:42, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> > * New upstream release (Closes: #215095). > >> > - Closes: #225702 > >> > Already explained in the bug report, also, see kaffe > >> > changelog: 2003-08-28 Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > . > >> > - Closes: #225691 > >> > Already explained in the bug report, also, see kaffe > >> > changelog: 2003-09-01 Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > . > >> > - Closes: #207998 > >> > Already explained in the bug report, also, see kaffe > >> > changelog: 2003-10-06 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > There has already been explained in each bugs. Dalibor Topic and I did > track all of them to see if they were closed (there was upstream > bugs). > > What I did is give a reference in the upstream changelog so that you can > go and read the entry. If you prefer I copy paste each entry in the > debian/changelog, file a wishlist and I'll do it but it's impossible > today. -- Ean Schuessler, CTO Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
