On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote: [alternate name for "j2se-package"] > Maybe most of people like mpkg-xx name. I suggest 'mpkg-j2se'. It's > more intuitive.
Okay. I'm overruled. The script will be renamed into 'mpkg-j2se'. Should the package also be called 'mpkg-j2se'? Another question: Jan proposed (in private mail) to rename the created package "sun-j2sdk1.4" into "sun-j2sdk1.4upstream" (or something similar) and to rename the peer package from "sun-j2sdk1.4debian" into "sun-j2sdk1.4"? In his opinion, this solves some problems with dependences and the proposal for the new java policy. Any comments on this proposal? regards, Hubert Schmid -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
