From: Hubert Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [ANN] New version of j2se-package (formerly mpkg-j2sdk) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 23:53:00 +0100 (CET) > [alternate name for "j2se-package"] > > Maybe most of people like mpkg-xx name. I suggest 'mpkg-j2se'. It's > > more intuitive. > > Okay. I'm overruled. The script will be renamed into 'mpkg-j2se'. Should > the package also be called 'mpkg-j2se'?
Of course. You said package name and scirpt should be same already:) Well, regarding Jan's mail, j2se may be not familier for some people. This is really nit picks, but mpkg-java maybe better. > Another question: Jan proposed (in private mail) to rename the created > package "sun-j2sdk1.4" into "sun-j2sdk1.4upstream" (or something similar) > and to rename the peer package from "sun-j2sdk1.4debian" into > "sun-j2sdk1.4"? In his opinion, this solves some problems with > dependences and the proposal for the new java policy. > > Any comments on this proposal? IMO, separated package is unfriendly for user (but it seems frendly for developers Hubert already mentioned). I prefer building single package for user and if I can, I don't want to upload each peer packages like sun-xxx,and ibm-xxx. This is related about Gybas's worry about a lot of small packages. regards, Takashi Okamoto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
