Hello On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:16:01AM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >Hi > > > >Well there seems to be some vauge statements in the policy. I assumed > >that blackdown should present both java1-runtime _and_ java2-runtime > >becuse it can fulfill both runtime requirements (in reasonable way). > > > >What do people on the debian java list think about this? > > That seems right to me. Note that some packages which provide > java2-runtime might not provide java1-runtime, particularly if > they don't support the deprecated methods...
Do I have to make this more clear in the policy? Should I make better recommendation when to provide what, or should we trust peoples common sense? Regards, // Ola > - Alex > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
