reassign 182466 java-common thanks Hi
Well there seems to be some vauge statements in the policy. I assumed that blackdown should present both java1-runtime _and_ java2-runtime becuse it can fulfill both runtime requirements (in reasonable way). What do people on the debian java list think about this? Regards, // Ola On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 08:07:16PM +0200, Heikki Kantola wrote: > Package: libbatik-java > Version: 1.5beta2-4 (not installed) > Severity: normal > > Currently libbatik-java seems to depend on "kaffe|java1-runtime", > thus if the Blackdown Java2 packages (yes, outside Debian archives) > are present APT happily wants to install also kaffe as those packages > don't provide "java1-runtime" (but "java2-runtime" they provide). > Also from <URL:http://xml.apache.org/batik/install.html> I gather that > Batik needs JVM compatible with Java 1.3 or newer to run, thus the > "java1-runtime" propably should be changed into "java2-runtime" as I > cannot think any Java 1.3 compatible JVM, which would not go under > Java2-label. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable > Architecture: i386 > Kernel: Linux nimbocumulus 2.4.19-pre10-ac2 #2 Thu Jun 13 22:16:09 EEST 2002 i686 > Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI > > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
