Hi
I have now made some updates to the current java policy.
I have removed some things about the PROPOSED status. It is about
to be a sharp version so that part is wiped out.
Changes related to JNI and GCJ.
<para>
Both are shipped as Java bytecode (<filename>*.class</filename>
files, packaged in a <filename>*.jar</filename> archive) and with
an "Architecture: all" since Java bytecode is supposed to be portable.
It may additionally be shipped as machine code, as produced for example
by the GNU Compiler for Java, in a separate architecture-specific
package.
</para>
<para>
If the Java code depends on code written in a "native" language,
for example Java Native Interface code, the compiled native code
&should; be shipped in a separate architecture-specific package.
The package containing Java bytecode should depend on this
package.
</para>
That is the major changes.
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
