What's the final decision on javadoc installation ? /usr/share/javadoc/ or just /usr/share/doc/ ? - Henri Gomez ___[_]____ EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-----Original Message----- >From: GOMEZ Henri >Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:45 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [summary] Re: policy proposition for javadoc installation > > >>Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >> >>> Debian doesn't use RPM as part of the package management >>> infrastructure, and any limitations of RPM is therefore >irrelevant to >>> how Debian should handle javadoc, and (in general) Debian policy. >>> >>> So, again: why should Debian policy care about RPM systems? >> >> >>Only in the context of standardization for more general Linux >>and/or GNU >>systems. I.e. if/when Linux Standard Base or some similar project >>should tackle Java, can you make a good case that they should >>base it on >>the Debian policy? > >the JPackage team, which doing RPM packaging of java tools and apps, >has just asked you debian java list what's are some of your policies >to see if we could find some commons. > >If you remember and take a look on mail archives, you'll discover >some of my mail to some Debian fellow on tomcat and jakarta list >about location of java jars. You'll see also that my RPM use >/usr/share/java for at least 18 months, at a time nobody even >spoke about packaging java. > >Yes the question is not RPM/DEBIAN, but related to LSB, and that's >why we try to determine if we could find common policies ;) > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
