Re: Large-scale java policy violations

[Per Bothner]

Stefan Gybas wrote:

> Basically yes, but IMHO this should be the decision of the local admin
> and not of the package maintainer. How could he know ig his package
> contains "standard" jars? This means that no package should automatically
> put jars or symlinks there. This would be /etc/java/default-classpath/ in
> my proposal. 

No, if a "local admin" has to manually maintain a file for the default 
classpath
then you no longer have a default classpath.

You do not ask a "local admin" to manually maintain /etc/ld.so.onf
or /usr/include.  That is *our* job.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]