On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:33:54PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Sunday 16 September 2001 13:00, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:32:51AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
> > Ok. Lets standardize on the libfoo[version]-java names.
>
> I really like to comment that i do not think we should punish those
> who complied to the current Java policy, and use
> lib-foo[version]-java instead...
Of course we should not punish anyone, especially not the ones that
made the current policy. :)
But personally I like libfoo[version]-java better because it is
more similar to the libfoo packages (for C). This is a tiny issue though
so I let other people decide. So what do you people think?
Regards,
// Ola
> Egon
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
