--On Tuesday, November 09, 2004 17:04 +0100 martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach Dale E. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1652 +0100]:With this approach you can't bounce RBLed messages at SMTP connect time though, right? (I realize that RBLs are semi-controversial, especially at the ISP level.)
right. i use spamassassin for RBLs
I use SA for most, but a few I run right up front at the postfix level, bl.spamcop.net being the first and most effective of these. Little to no complaints BTW, with atleast half a million envelopes a day. We also have a 50% reject rate, so we've cut our mail volume in half.
We'd have to have quite a bit more mail server horsepower already if it weren't for rejecting up front like that. SA is great, but why let known spamming hosts in at all?
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
