also sprach John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1514 +0100]: > It seems to make a lot of sense to me, but it seems too that > I must be missing something.
if the backup MX is configured exactly like the primary, then it makes sense. but it's all too easy to get out of sync. i usually have my backup MX accept everything and then don't treat them specially on the primary. thus, policy is still enforced on the primary, but there is a proper backup path *under my control* should the primary be unreachable for whatever reason. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
