On Tue, 7 May 2002, Craig Sanders wrote: > > and assumes dialup/DSL people to be guilty by default. > > Dynamic IP address is the criteria.
Ok, if that the *only* criteria I don't have a problem with it. > > Making the ISP accountible for the mail sent by their customers by > > having it forced through their MTA in this way is a senseless way of > > approaching the problem, IMHO. > > making ISPs responsible for the mail sent by their customers is the ONLY > thing that actually works. I don't get this. In the other thread you advocate that site size shouldn't matter, and I agree to that when it comes to this thing. Following this reasoning, would you want to force an ISP that only has a single connection also to deliver all their mail through that upstream ISP's MTAs, purely for accountability purposes? That's nonsense. Hopefully DUL indeed only lists dynamic IP blocks. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
