> Yes, the second invocation is the correct behavior. The first > (preloading libfakeroot) dies with a segmentation fault.
Seems that the signal handling on ia64 changes under fakeroot in a way that doesn't happen on other architectures.
> Yes, the second invocation is the correct behavior. The first > (preloading libfakeroot) dies with a segmentation fault.
Seems that the signal handling on ia64 changes under fakeroot in a way that doesn't happen on other architectures.