Christian Perrier wrote: > Anyway, as I'll certainly not be the one doing the work, I can only > bring an advice here and I just want to warn against too wide goals > which will make the change depend on so many different parts of Debian > that a single person will never succeed doing it and it will take more > than one release cycle to do it.
I said that I am interested in working on this, not that I am going to do it all alone. Mostly because I am no expert of Debian Menu system, and do not want to accidentally reinvent the wheel. > Even the menu l10n cannot certainly be a release goal for Etch. But > "we" (I'd better say "you", meaning Bill, you and other interested > parties) can at least prepare a reasonable release goal for etch+1 > which would include *at the minimum* the l10n of Debian menu > entries... I read your earlier messages a bit wrong, I guess. Yes, there are two separate issues to be solved: (1) l10n in XDG environments (GNOME, KDE, etc.); (2) l10n in non-XDG environments (Fluxbox, WMaker, etc.). I was actually talking about (1) because, as far as I know, not many non-XDG environments benefit from l10n. Although some environments, like Fluxbox for example, do seem to support "longtitle" and UTF-8 encoding. > PS: we should take care of keeping Bill involved in this discussion. Certainly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
