On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:41:36AM +0200, Ionel Mugurel CiobÃcÄ wrote:
> ISO-8859-16. Latin9 replace Latin1 and Latin10 (ISO-8859-16) replace
> Latin2.

Unlike Latin 9, Latin 10 doesn't cover all the languages of its 
predecessor - Czech, for example, isn't covered by Latin 10. So
it's not a full replacement.

-- 
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and 
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg


Reply via email to