În data de 14/09/2001, 08:48:36, David Starner a scris: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:41:36AM +0200, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote: > > ISO-8859-16. Latin9 replace Latin1 and Latin10 (ISO-8859-16) replace > > Latin2. > > Unlike Latin 9, Latin 10 doesn't cover all the languages of its > predecessor - Czech, for example, isn't covered by Latin 10. So > it's not a full replacement. >
Latin 10 doesn't cover all the languages of its predecessor, you are right. But it is the only one covering Romanian language. Latin2 was not good for Romanian. Ionel
