Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think tt may be easy to provide the forked package with utf-8 support > for testing. Is this still OK ?
Absolutely. > maybe newt-uff8 and slang1-utf8 or newt-i18n and slang1-i18n. I think I like the *-utf8 names better. > They would have conflict with the normal version. And if they are > OK, then the normal package can merge the utf-8 support safely, and > we won't need the separate pacakages then. Sounds good. > I think bogl-bterm has been included in unstable/sid. Ah, thanks, excellent. > > > Well, so there may be softwares which can not handle the config files > > > written in utf-8 encoding. If we use utf-8 as main encoding in Debian, > > > we need to work on them. > > > > I'd rather not force that, esp. for users who just need the ASCII > > set. Can't we get it to write out the config files (such as > > /etc/hosts, /etc/network/interfaces, etc) in ASCII? > > OK. I won't object it. I wonder what changes need to be done to dbootstrap to fix this, then. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
