On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > I'm worried that the next release after woody will be 3 or 4 years > from now.
> > Trying to coordinate too many archs. What about pushing for an indepenent > > release cycle? Debian is like a dancing centipede with seventy broken > > legs. To add Hurd to the centepede would make the situation worse for > > everyone. > > I don't agree. The packages in stable are out of date by policy, not > coordination effort. Testing deals with most release problems, since > it's always a snapshot of the packages that are current. I want to > get us into testing so that maintainers share the responsibility of > making sure their packages work on our system. > Hadn't thought of that, a good idea. I still wish that the release cycle was twice as fast. Phil. - Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Dunedin, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818 Mobile 025 267 9420. I sell GNU/Linux CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz [EMAIL PROTECTED] - preferred. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
