On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:39:22AM +0000, Philip Charles wrote: > > > My gut feeling is that a woody Hurd release would be too soon, but I > > > expect a release the next time round. A testing release with woody would > > > be great. > > > > I'm worried that the next release after woody will be 3 or 4 years from now. > > Trying to coordinate too many archs. What about pushing for an indepenent > release cycle? Debian is like a dancing centipede with seventy broken > legs. To add Hurd to the centepede would make the situation worse for > everyone.
I don't agree. The packages in stable are out of date by policy, not coordination effort. Testing deals with most release problems, since it's always a snapshot of the packages that are current. I want to get us into testing so that maintainers share the responsibility of making sure their packages work on our system. Boot-disks are a different problem, but I don't know enough about that to comment. Tks, Jeff Bailey
