[Sorry for replying so late but I just noticed this now.] On Sat, 2026-08-01 at 16:30 +0200, [email protected] wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2026 15:43, Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Marcos Talau <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > Hi there! > > > > > > [I added Andrew Lee to the conversation.] > > > > > > During last week's DebConf I participated in a Go sprint, and one of the > > > tasks > > > assigned was to add this file to several packages [1] and then adjust the > > > CI > > > configuration. The first part I did was add this file; the second step I > > > was > > > going to do was adjust the CI configuration. [...] > I support what Marcos is doing, having a standard name is best. I am unsure > of what you are complaining.
It isn't clear in the commit messages that the CI config was updated as well; to me, it looked like the file was just being added. Only after checking settings for at least one project I could see CI was changed to point to debian/salsa-ci.yml. The main issue is that debian/gitlab-ci.yml was just left behind; this should be removed from any repos where Marcos has added a salsa-ci.yml file. -- Maytham
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
