Martina Ferrari <t...@tina.pm> writes: > 1. Recommends `wrap-and-sort -tsa`, along with changes in default > settings for dh-make-golang.
Do you have anything against 'wrap-and-sort 'satbk'? I believe for most cases it results in the same output, but it does result in predictable binary package sort order (except for the first package) which I find more predictable when paging through debian/control and having some mental model where to find different parts of a package. Most packages in Go are simple with just one or two binary packages, so I'm hoping this is not too difficult to agree on if you already settled for '-tsa'. > 2. Recommends switching to the `upstream/*` namespace for following > upstream branches, to ease tracking different upstream repositories, > repackaging commits, etc. A tool to automate this switch would go a > long way towards adoption. +1 if we can describe a set of simple commands to make this switch, right now I don't know how to do it using simple git commands. Using the 'salsa' tool is a non-starter for me, I don't want to be looked into a workflow that depends on having shared secrets available in plain text on my machine. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
