Dear all, i have no strong feelings according the canonical name of the library package, so either will do.
Best regards, Martin Am 12. Dezember 2024 21:36:08 UTC schrieb Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org>: >On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:12 AM Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: >> >> Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> writes: >> >> > https://github.com/Debian/dh-make-golang/blob/d70d43c2c98bd8419d41c7dc741ece4bff437ff1/make.go#L575 >> > >> > We maintain a list of well-known hosts. If you want to change the >> > value for this host, please submit PR against this list. >> > dh-make-golang also says that: >> >> I just looked at packaging >> >> gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/ptutil >> >> which results in a source package name of >> >> golang-gitlab.torproject-tpo-anti-censorship-pluggable-transports-ptutil >> >> and a binary of >> >> golang-gitlab.torproject-tpo-anti-censorship-pluggable-transports-ptutil-dev >> >> which isn't pretty. >> > >But why do you need a pretty package name anyway? These packages are >only used in Build-Depends. End users are not expected to see/remember >them. > >> Are those names okay? >> >> Any suggestions on alternative names? >> >> golang-torproject-ptutil? >> >> golang-torproject-pluggable-transports-ptutil? >> >> /Simon > > >
