tor 2024-12-12 klockan 17:13 +0800 skrev Shengjing Zhu: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 4:50 PM Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> > wrote: > > > > Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> writes: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 6:59 AM Simon Josefsson > > > <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > ons 2024-12-11 klockan 21:01 +0000 skrev Martin Dosch: > > > > > Dear Simon, > > > > > > > > > > Am 11.12.2024 20:59, schrieb Simon Josefsson: > > > > > > The naming of golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58 is a bit > > > > > > weird, how > > > > > > about > > > > > > golang-github-gearnode-base58 and golang-github-gearnode- > > > > > > base58-dev > > > > > > instead? What is the Go team policy on this? > > > > > > > > > > as this name was created by dh-make-golang I assumed it > > > > > follows the > > > > > policy. But let's wait and see what some more experienced Go > > > > > team > > > > > members think on that one. > > > > > > > > I suppose that's good enough for me, but let's see if anyone > > > > responds > > > > within 2 days or I'll do the upload. I think the documented > > > > naming > > > > guide is broken, I think we only rarely follow this advice: > > > > > > > > https://go-team.pages.debian.net/packaging.html#_naming_conventions > > > > > > > > In your case, that would suggest using 'base85' as the source > > > > package > > > > name, which I don't think is a good idea generally. > > > > > > You refer to the wrong section, please read > > > https://go-team.pages.debian.net/packaging.html#_naming_conventions_2 > > > Martin and dh-make-golang are right. > > > > I was talking about the source package name above. > > > > I'm confused now, which one do you suggest? > > > > 1) > > > > dh-make-golang-style: > > > > Source: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58 > > Package: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58-dev > > > > This is right, and the policy also says that. I'm not sure why you > say > the policy is 2. Maybe you are confused by "Binary-only packages" and > "Library (or binary + library) packages"?
Sorry, I misread the links. You are right, thanks for insisting. So Martin I think the names you/dh-make-golang picked are the right ones. I'll do another review and make the upload shortly. I still think the names looks ugly but consistency and following policy is the simple choice here. /Simon > > > > 2) > > > > Our policy documents, two links above: > > > > Source: base58 > > Package: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58-dev > > > > 3) > > > > My initial suggestion > > > > Source: golang-github-gearno-base58 > > Package: golang-github-gearno-base58-dev > > > > 4) > > > > My revised suggestion > > > > Source: golang-github-gearno-base58 > > Package: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58-dev > > > > 5) > > > > Something else? > > > > /Simon > > > > -- > Shengjing Zhu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
