On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:28:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:04:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 23:30 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 14:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > > > Given the timescales of the upcoming 6.0.2 and the larger-than-usual > > > > > > size of the diff, we'd prefer to look at getting this uploaded > > > > > > early in > > > > > > the 6.0.3 cycle, to give us a longer period with the updated version > > > > > > available for testing. > > > > > > > > We're now rather late in the 6.0.3 cycle - in fact, the point release > > > > should already have happened (there's been a small amount of scheduling > > > > fail). > > > > > > Does it mean we should consider it for the 6.0.4 cycle instead? > > > > That might be a better idea, but possibly depends on when the 6.0.3 > > release ends up being, which is somewhat up in the air still; sorry for > > messing you around on this. Hopefully we'll have more of a plan soon. > > > > > > > Unfortunately the 2.11.4 release never happened upstream, it's seems > > > > > to > > > > > be blocked currently. > > > > > > > > Is there any hint as to whether that's likely to be a short-term issue, > > > > or to persist for some time? > > > > > > > Given I haven't got any answer to the mails I sent to the call for > > > testing thread, I don't expect this issue will be fixed soon. > > > > That is rather unfortunate, indeed. :-( > > There has been some activity on the 2.11 branch upstream, with some more > fixes (mainly integrating patches we had in Debian), though we don't > have much informations about when 2.11.4 is going to be released. >
The status is that glibc 2.11.4 will be released when Debian feels it is ready, as we are the main testers here. I am planning to do some more testing of the current SVN on more machines, and everything seems fine around the release of 6.0.3, I'll ask around for the release of 2.11.4. I can then upload it to stable just after the release of 6.0.3, which should give us sufficient additional testing before the release of 6.0.4. How does it sound to you? -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110910205315.ga2...@volta.aurel32.net
