On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 14:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > Thanks. From what I've seen, I'd be interested in seeing the fixes > > > applied to p-u. > > > > > > Given the timescales of the upcoming 6.0.2 and the larger-than-usual > > > size of the diff, we'd prefer to look at getting this uploaded early in > > > the 6.0.3 cycle, to give us a longer period with the updated version > > > available for testing. > > We're now rather late in the 6.0.3 cycle - in fact, the point release > should already have happened (there's been a small amount of scheduling > fail).
Does it mean we should consider it for the 6.0.4 cycle instead? > > Unfortunately the 2.11.4 release never happened upstream, it's seems to > > be blocked currently. > > Is there any hint as to whether that's likely to be a short-term issue, > or to persist for some time? > Given I haven't got any answer to the mails I sent to the call for testing thread, I don't expect this issue will be fixed soon. Regards, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110829213058.gk11...@hall.aurel32.net
